Skip to main content

Roth vs. Traditional Calculator

Compare the after-tax retirement value of a Roth vs. Traditional contribution.

Your contribution and tax rates

Capped automatically at the 2026 limit for your account and age.

Determines the after-tax cost of a Roth contribution.

Your best guess at your bracket when you withdraw.

Traditional comes out ahead

$165,884

difference in after-tax value at withdrawal

Traditional

Pre-tax balance

$1,658,843

Tax owed at withdrawal

$199,061

After-tax value

$1,459,781

Roth

Equivalent after-tax contribution

$9,360

Same take-home cost as the Traditional contribution above

After-tax value (tax-free)

$1,293,897

Estimate calculated from the numbers you entered. This is not financial, tax, or legal advice — always consult a qualified professional before making significant financial decisions.

How the Roth vs. Traditional Calculator works

This tool projects the after-tax value of the same retirement contribution made either way — Traditional (pre-tax now, taxed at withdrawal) or Roth (taxed now, tax-free at withdrawal) — using your expected tax rate today and in retirement, and the 2026 contribution limits for your account type.

The formula

Traditional after-tax = FV(contribution) × (1 − rate at withdrawal)
Roth after-tax = FV(contribution × (1 − rate today))

Both formulas compound the same way — the only difference is whether the tax haircut is applied before growth (Roth) or after growth (Traditional). When the two tax rates are identical, both formulas produce the same number.

Common mistakes

  • Comparing the same nominal contribution amount for both — a Roth contribution costs more out of pocket today than a Traditional one for the same pre-tax dollar figure.
  • Assuming your retirement tax bracket will match your current one — Social Security, RMDs, and pension income can push it higher or lower than expected.
  • Ignoring state income tax — this calculator only models federal rates; a state with no income tax favors Traditional less than one with a high rate.

Frequently asked questions

What is the real difference between Roth and Traditional accounts?

A Traditional 401(k) or IRA contribution reduces your taxable income today, grows tax-deferred, and is taxed as ordinary income when you withdraw it in retirement. A Roth contribution comes from money you've already paid tax on, grows completely tax-free, and withdrawals in retirement owe no tax at all. The math comes down to one question: is your tax rate today higher or lower than the tax rate you expect in retirement?

Why does this calculator use a smaller contribution amount for Roth?

To compare fairly, this tool assumes you can afford the same take-home-pay hit either way. A $10,000 Traditional contribution costs you $10,000 out of your paycheck before tax is even calculated. To put the same $10,000 pre-tax amount into a Roth, you'd first have to pay income tax on it — so the equivalent Roth contribution is $10,000 × (1 − your current tax rate). This is the standard methodology used by most retirement calculators, including Vanguard's and Fidelity's.

What are the 2026 contribution limits?

For 401(k), 403(b), and similar employer plans: $24,500, plus an $8,000 catch-up if you're 50 or older, or a $11,250 "super catch-up" if you're between 60 and 63 (SECURE 2.0). For IRAs: $7,500, plus a $1,100 catch-up at 50 or older. This calculator applies your limit automatically based on the account type and age you enter.

When does Traditional win, and when does Roth win?

If your tax rate is the same today and in retirement, the two options produce an identical after-tax result — the math is symmetric. Traditional wins if you expect to be in a lower tax bracket in retirement than you are now (common for many savers, since retirement income is often lower than working income). Roth wins if you expect a higher tax bracket in retirement — common for younger savers early in their careers, or anyone who expects tax rates to rise generally.

What actually moves this number

Specific levers, and roughly what each one is worth. Not “save more” — the things that change the figure above by an amount you can measure.

  • Split rather than agonize

    Nobody knows their future bracket. Contributing to both gives you tax-free and taxable buckets to draw from in retirement, which lets you manage the year's taxable income deliberately — often worth more than getting the original call right.

  • Favor Roth in an unusually low-income year

    A gap year, a sabbatical, a first job, or early retirement before benefits start are the moments when paying tax now is cheapest. The same logic makes those years the best ones for Roth conversions.

  • Remember Roth removes the RMD problem

    Traditional balances force taxable withdrawals in your seventies on the IRS schedule whether you need the money or not. Roth IRAs have no lifetime RMD, and Roth 401(k)s no longer do either.

  • Factor in the state you expect to retire in

    Contributing traditional in a high-income-tax state and withdrawing in a no-income-tax one captures a deduction you never repay. Moving the other direction does the reverse, and it is a swing large enough to flip the answer.

What this calculator does not cover

Every calculator simplifies, and the useful thing is knowing exactly where. These are the specific gaps between this estimate and your real situation:

  • The comparison turns on your tax rate now versus in retirement, which nobody knows. Treat the result as a sensitivity test rather than an answer.
  • It does not model required minimum distributions, which apply to traditional balances and not to Roth IRAs during the owner's lifetime.
  • Income phase-outs for Roth IRA eligibility and traditional IRA deductibility are not modeled.
  • State tax now versus state tax in retirement can flip the answer, particularly if you expect to move between a high-tax and a no-income-tax state.

For anything that turns on an exact figure, use the primary sources below or a qualified professional. How these limits are decided and disclosed is described in the editorial standards.

Written and maintained by Víctor Gil VázquezData last verified: 07/29/2026